on 5.05.2008

Did Jesus have to die for this sermon?

...That was a question often posed to us at seminary as we trodged our way through the world of composing sermons. One professor, it is rumored, would follow student preachers back to the sacristy after daily chapel and confront them with this question if he felt that it didn't bring the hearer to the critical answer of relying on Jesus' encompassing sacrifice on the cross. The question has been set up through the ages as a kind of standard by which to measure the effectiveness of a sermon. (And it seems, it's been a particularly Lutheran question to ask.)

Many of us would-be preachers, to avoid the professor-ial confrontation, inserted quick notes on Jesus' death in our sermons, hoping against hope that a mention of his death would suffice as an answer to this standard bearing question.

The question is built in such a way that it helps preachers discern whether their words are simply self-help or true gospel--that is, that the words we preach bring hearers to the place where they must cling to the hope of the cross or face eternal peril. Did Jesus have to die for this sermon? Or did Oprah help you with your research? The question has a good deal of merit.

But where I begin to sweat coldly is in the venture of preaching through the Old Testament. It's much easier to mention the death of Jesus when you're talking about him as explicity as the New Testament does. In the Old Testament, it's a much harder deal to help hearers appreciate the good news of Jesus' death.

Yet, it's precisely in the Old Testament where Jesus gets his good news in the first place. In the Psalms, buried in the codes of Leviticus, under the sub-text of Abraham, Jesus discerns the message that will become his life -- the kingdom of God is at hand. And wasn't it this message that led Jesus to his death? Wouldn't a more fitting question be asked: did your sermon show people the kingdom of God in our world?

After all, that's what is happening in Jesus' death. God is reigning. That's what is happening in Jesus' miracles. God is reigning. That's what's happening in Jesus' teachings. God is reigning. And wouldn't it be a fuller standard if we pushed people to ask the question of their sermons: did your hearers see more of God's kingdom in our world?

My biggest beef with the "did Jesus have to die for your sermon" question is its narrow focus on the atoning work of Jesus. While this is huge (don't get me wrong, it's very huge!), its narrow focus drives us only to see part of the story. The whole story is that God reigns with Jesus, and his death and resurrection are confirmation of that fact.

What say y'all? Is the question a helpful one for preachers to continue to lift up as a standard for measuring effectiveness in preaching? Are there others? What about this kingdom of God question?

1 comments:

lotusreaching said...

I was at "Northland: A Church Distributed" this last Monday night for a worship service. Northland is a local megachurch, founded by a United Methodist Pastor 20+ years ago. Worship was phenomenal...lights and music and imagery all choreographed to bring the worshipper into an immersive experience better than most shows.

Personally, I loved it. I love big church, big stages, great music and even better musical leadership.

And I love big time preaching. Joel Hunter, the senior pastor, was entertaining and engaging and helpful as he rolled through the topic of managing anger in relationships. His sermon took 40 minutes and he opened his Bible 13 times (the guy I was with counted), but disappointingly only to reference an outline he had hidden inside. The verses he did use were one liners quoted from memory and out of context.

I thought about this question as he was preaching and as I pondered the sermon afterwards. Jesus certainly didn't have to die for that sermon to be preached. Dr. Phil could have done a better job and it would have been an equally compelling experience.

That made me sad on the one hand. ON the other side of the conversation is this: we pastors and the churches we lead are in the business of equipping. Our call is to equip people for lives lived in the Gospel of Jesus Christ with a vision of the fullness of his reign.

Which means that I think at some point I'd better be preaching on anger and what it does to human relationships. Because God's kingdom is about relationships. In fact, it's about people, hard headed, angry, emotional, relationship destroying people. These people are the church, and the one thing that I think 100's of years of good Lutheran preaching has done is to disconnect a lived life of faith from the reign of God pointed to in Christ's resurrection.

Methodists have this thing called "sanctification." The Holy Spirit grabs ahold of us and over times shapes us into the likeness of Jesus.

Lutheran's have a concept of justification...what Christ has done (past tense) but seem to be woefully deficient regarding conversation on what Jesus through his Spirit is still doing in Nathan's life today, in Paul's life today, and in the life of the regular folks in our congregations.

So what we've taught is that Jesus connects to some sort of metaphysical need we all have (that most don't recognize that we actually have) and have rendered Jesus speechless in light of the dawning and fading light of our particular star...today.

Great conversation starter Paul. And I've come along way since seminary on just this issue. The cross is a cross that is life not in abstract, but in the dust and heat of this day...May 15th, 2008.

So the seminary question while reminding us that Jesus is central is just part of the conversation.

There has to be more...

From the land of Sun and Palms,

Nathan Swenson-Reinhold
wannabe Pastor and sometimes equipper of strangely wonderful and regular people, who get angry and get alot of other things too...